ABSTRACT
Einleitung In der COVID-19-Pandemie zählen Pflegebedürftige zu den besonders vulnerablen Bevölkerungsgruppen. Ambulante Pflegedienste befanden sich gerade zu Beginn der Pandemie in einer Ausnahmesituation. In dieser Arbeit sollen die Situation und die Probleme der Pflegedienste und der versorgten Pflegebedürftigen in den ersten beiden Wellen der Pandemie in Deutschland untersucht werden. Methoden Während der ersten beiden COVID-19-Wellen wurden zwei Querschnittstudien durchgeführt (erste Befragung: 28.04.–12.05.2020, zweite Befragung: 12.01.–07.02.2021). Insgesamt wurden Daten aus N = 1029 ambulanten Pflegediensten in die Analyse einbezogen. Die Analyse erfolgte anhand deskriptiver Maßzahlen. Ergebnisse Die Klient:innen von Pflegediensten waren in den ersten beiden Wellen der Pandemie stark belastet. Dies zeigt sich einerseits an einem erhöhten Erkrankungsrisiko und einer erhöhten Mortalität und andererseits am Wegfall verschiedener Versorgungs- und Unterstützungsangebote. Letzteres hat z. B. auch negative Auswirkungen auf die psychosoziale Verfassung der Pflegebedürftigen. Die Pflegedienste waren von hohen Personalausfällen und zusätzlicher Arbeit durch Schutzmaßnahmen betroffen. Diskussion Die COVID-19-Pandemie führte zu großen Belastungen von Pflegebedürftigen und ambulanten Pflegediensten und zu einer Reduzierung der Versorgungsangebote. Die Verschlechterung der Versorgung traf auf eine bereits angespannte Situation. Es zeigt sich, dass die Versorgung Pflegebedürftiger durch ambulante Pflegedienste nicht krisensicher gestaltet ist und dass zusätzliche Herausforderungen wie die einer Pandemie dramatische Folgen haben können. Zukünftig sollte es verlässliche Strukturen und schnell verfügbare Notfallpläne mit konkreten Handlungsanweisungen geben.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, people in need of long-term care were among the most vulnerable population groups. Home-care services were under exceptional strain, especially at the beginning of the pandemic. The aim of this study is to examine the situation and problems of care services and the people in need of care during the first two waves of the pandemic in Germany. METHODS: Two cross-sectional studies were conducted during the first two COVID-19 waves (first survey 28 April to 12 May 2020, second survey 12 January to 7 February 2021). In total, data from Nâ¯= 1029 outpatient care services were included in the analysis. Descriptive measures were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The clients of home-care services were severely burdened in the first two waves of the pandemic. This can be seen on the one hand in an increased risk of illness and increased mortality, and on the other in the loss of various care and support services. The latter also has negative effects on the psychosocial condition of those in need of care, for example. Care services were affected by high staff absenteeism and additional work due to protective measures. DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to immense burdens for people in need of care and home-care services and to a reduction in care services. The deterioration of care provision met with an already tense situation. It has become clear that the provision of care for those in need of care by outpatient care services is not crisis-proof, and that additional challenges such as a pandemic can have dramatic consequences. For the future, reliable structures and readily available emergency plans should be established with concrete instructions for action.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Home Care Services , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Germany/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic have posed major challenges to different groups. One of these are informal caregivers. This study investigates the changes the pandemic has caused for informal caregivers and the extent to which quality of life and burden of care have changed for specific subgroups. METHODS: Data for this cross-sectional study was gathered in the summer of 2020 in a convenient sample of informal caregivers (<â¯67 years of age, Nâ¯= 1143). In addition to sociodemographic data, information on the care situation, compatibility of care and work, as well as stress and quality of life was collected in an online survey. The analysis of care situations and compatibility of care and work is done descriptively. Logistic regression models are used for a subgroup analysis of quality of life and care burden. RESULTS: The care situation has changed for 54.7% of participants and has become more time consuming. For 70.8% of respondents, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it even more difficult to balance care-giving and work. However, most respondents were satisfied with their employers' pandemic management (65.9%). A sharp decline in the quality of life and an increase in the burden of care for informal caregivers was ascertained. Both developments are stronger for young and female caregivers and for those caring for people with a greater need of support. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that living situations worsened for a substantial proportion of informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Policymakers should recognize additional challenges that informal caregivers have faced since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and how they vary by subgroups. It is important to include home-based informal care as well as other care settings in future pandemic concepts.